Ars Longa, Vita Brevis

Below are excerpts of Barack Obama's acceptance speech of the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize on December 10, 2009 in Oslo Norway, such demonstrates the concept that Totalitarianism Seeks To Isolate. Obama starts his exposition on a manifest function that peace must have a positive latent support on the inherent rights and dignity of every person.

This in the concrete will verify the President Obama is using power and control tactics in a maker-taker world by isolating my in-continuo persecution, citizens, and natural persons along the Colorado River Valley into Mexico. The Chemical Assault - Scorched Earth conditions began on June 17, 1987, the 200th Anniversary of the United States Constitution.

Obama invokes the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) which the United States has not ratified. This country has ratified the Convention Against Torture (CAT). President Obama has sworn to uphold the Bill of Rights which are the substantive guarantees of his country and the model in part of the UDHR.

A neo realist position is a concrete based idealist position that stresses anarchy, order, and constraints. In the concrete the United States is anarchic and is engaging in a dangerous game of brinksmanship with Iran and North Korea. Obama demonstrates that he can be blackmailed and extorted to alienate me from owed guarantees under the Bill of Rights as the 8th Amendment - to remain free from cruel and unusual treatment.

I reject these choices. I believe that peace is unstable where citizens are denied the right to speak freely or worship as they please; choose their own leaders or assemble without fear. Pent-up grievances fester, and the suppression of tribal and religious identity can lead to violence. We also know that the opposite is true.

I am a ritvik Hare Krishna, never initiated. I have never have associated in person with any other devotee of my faith in person, only online, I know devotees who are diksa vadis, those that maintain a living teacher - guru must be followed. I became a ritvik in April of 2004 after reading records online.

In close President Obama's duplicity has damaged the United States and the Nobel Peace Organization's prestige. The country is the world's only super power. It has the resources to project destructive lethal power, and constrain economies by forcing defection to it's resources and capabilities.

Obama follows stating that America has never fought a war against another country. Without mangling his words Obama is condoning an attack against the the democracy of the United States.

The unproved latent function is that Cambridge Law School is behind these orchestrations.

Britain is the Mind, the United States is the Bodyguard.

Art is Long, life is short.

David Nollmeyer

Blythe CA 12-14-2009

http://nobelprize.org/mediaplayer/index.php?id=1221

America has never fought a war against a democracy, and our closest friends are governments that protect the rights of their citizens. No matter how callously defined, neither America's interests -- nor the world's -- are served by the denial of human aspirations.

This brings me to a second point -- the nature of the peace that we seek. For peace is not merely the absence of visible conflict. Only a just peace based on the inherent rights and dignity of every individual can truly be lasting.

It was this insight that drove drafters of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights after the Second World War. In the wake of devastation, they recognized that if human rights are not protected, peace is a hollow promise.

And yet too often, these words are ignored. For some countries, the failure to uphold human rights is excused by the false suggestion that these are somehow Western principles, foreign to local cultures or stages of a nation's development. And within America, there has long been a tension between those who describe themselves as realists or idealists -- a tension that suggests a stark choice between the narrow pursuit of interests or an endless campaign to impose our values around the world.

I reject these choices. I believe that peace is unstable where citizens are denied the right to speak freely or worship as they please; choose their own leaders or assemble without fear. Pent-up grievances fester, and the suppression of tribal and religious identity can lead to violence. We also know that the opposite is true. Only when Europe became free did it finally find peace. America has never fought a war against a democracy, and our closest friends are governments that protect the rights of their citizens. No matter how callously defined, neither America's interests -- nor the world's -- are served by the denial of human aspirations.

So even as we respect the unique culture and traditions of different countries, America will always be a voice for those aspirations that are universal. We will bear witness to the quiet dignity of reformers like Aung Sang Suu Kyi; to the bravery of Zimbabweans who cast their ballots in the face of beatings; to the hundreds of thousands who have marched silently through the streets of Iran. It is telling that the leaders of these governments fear the aspirations of their own people more than the power of any other nation. And it is the responsibility of all free people and free nations to make clear that these movements -- these movements of hope and history -- they have us on their side.

IceRocket Tags: Nollmeyer,human rights,ethics,censorship,environment,political philosophy,political economy,iskcon,christianity,ritvik,law,powereality,homeland security,journalism,corporate history,university of california,radhanatha,nobel peace prize